[00:29] hacman_ (~hacman@f049066183.adsl.alicedsl.de) joined #fai. [00:31] hacman (~hacman@f049104199.adsl.alicedsl.de) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [05:45] BlindBunny1 (~BlindBunn@power.informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE) left irc: Quit: Terminated with extreme prejudice - dircproxy 1.0.5 [05:47] bill_ (~bill@lns-bzn-43-82-249-189-210.adsl.proxad.net) left irc: Quit: Quitte [06:18] BlindBunny1 (~BlindBunn@power.informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE) joined #fai. [06:27] siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) joined #fai. [07:20] msc (~msc@gw1.cgn3.hosteurope.de) joined #fai. [08:16] Mrfai (~lange@kueppers.informatik.uni-koeln.de) joined #fai. [09:00] verwilst (~verwilst@router.begen1.office.netnoc.eu) joined #fai. [09:43] Mrfai (~lange@kueppers.informatik.uni-koeln.de) left irc: Quit: leaving [09:43] Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) joined #fai. [09:52] <\sh> Mrfai: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597870 <- fai-setup bug from yesterday [09:55] hmm. [09:56] does fai 4.0~beta2 need cupt? [09:57] because fai-mirror is always trying to fetch it (although I already removed it from /etc/fai/NFSROOT) [10:04] no, I does not need it if you removed it from NFSROOT [10:05] hm.. then I wonder why it still tries to get it. its also not in any of my package_config files [10:07] maybe some package recommends it [10:08] ah [10:08] fai-mirror fetches recommends, too? for the case that a package_config could request recommends? [10:09] but OTOH I'm trying to create a fai-mirror with packages from lenny, I wouldn't expect any package in lenny to recommend cupt [10:19] Mrfai: after studying the source I noticed its because its using a file from the nfsroot to create the package list [10:20] ah yes. I remember. [10:21] fai-mirror is the only fai-tool I really really really dislike.. although I'm glad that you decided to use reprepro in the exp-branch [10:26] Action: oz_ now fais ubuntu, debian and win7 [10:53] verwilst (~verwilst@router.begen1.office.netnoc.eu) left irc: Quit: Ex-Chat [10:55] win7 ? =) [10:59] win7. I do this for a living, you know... [10:59] :-/ [11:33] we use fai as a cust-system for solaris and aix ... [11:38] yea, that's what it is intended for! [11:44] glance: I like to get more information about your FAI usage. Please fill out the FAI questionnaire. [11:44] http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/questionnaire [11:46] we allso use it as a cust step after kickstart =) [11:47] yea. some day we should tidy upp all the dirty hacks we have done and submit som patches and examples. [12:16] fai: 3 lange committed revision 6074 to 7 fai: new domain name for the project [12:18] fai: 3 lange committed revision 6075 to 7 fai: fix link and date [12:20] fai: 3 lange committed revision 6076 to 7 fai: new date [12:25] A dedicated domain for FAI? What is it? [12:28] You can guess it. I think I will announce it next week. [12:38] msantana (msantana@SDF.ORG) left irc: Quit: Coyote finally caught me [12:38] msantana (msantana@SDF.ORG) joined #fai. [12:45] ah, guter provider fuer die neue domain ;) [13:13] \sh (~shermann@nat.de.netviewer.com) left irc: Remote host closed the connection [13:14] Nic0 (~courtel@fw.tls.cena.fr) joined #fai. [13:40] Crud, I'm too unlucky to guess the domain name and too impatient for more trial and error :-) [13:49] Have a look at the commit of revision 6074. You'll find them in the net (maybe linked from the fai web page?) [13:55] sweet [15:28] msc (~msc@gw1.cgn3.hosteurope.de) left irc: Quit: msc [15:47] Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) left irc: Quit: leaving [16:15] maxyz (~maxy@190.55.95.11) left irc: Quit: Un elefante se columpiaba sobre un enlace de red, c.mo vei. que resist..a. [16:53] hmm. fai-cd supressing the mkisofs output is not very helpful in case of errors. [16:53] use the -v switch? [16:53] ah [16:53] does it? [16:55] oz_: it does not have a -v switch and yeah it does [16:55] basically all it says under some circumstances is "mkisofs failed." [16:56] no chance to debug that without modifying fai-cd [16:57] just modify [16:57] & patch :) [16:57] well the question is why one would want to supress the output of mkisofs [16:58] dunno ask thomas [16:58] I think I changed that, too :))) [16:58] its even so worse that it sets --logfile /dev/null AND --quiet, I guess leaving out the --logfile would still produce less output while keeping errors in the output [17:00] normally, tere shouldn't be probs with mkisofs [17:00] yeah [17:00] but whats normal anyway? ;) [17:01] .o0(P=NP?) [17:01] hm. :-) [17:01] ^^ [17:06] Nic0 (~courtel@fw.tls.cena.fr) left irc: Quit: Leaving. [17:25] hm. [17:25] "Encryted entry invalid in this context" - any idea what this could mean? [17:26] with that config: http://paste.debian.net/91471/ [17:26] (trying to get lvm on a crypto volume to work) [19:54] mikap (~mika@mail.michael-prokop.at) left irc: Remote host closed the connection [21:02] siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) left irc: Quit: Leaving. [21:23] fai: 3 mt committed revision 6077 to 7 fai: Updated experimental patches to match current trunk [00:00] --- Sat Sep 25 2010