| 06:00 \sh | moins |
| 06:11 oz_ | moins back violently |
| allee-k (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #fai. |
| siggg (~jean@AVelizy-151-1-42-212.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr) joined #fai. |
| verwilst (~verwilst@router.begen1.office.netnoc.eu) joined #fai. |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) joined #fai. |
| Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) joined #fai. |
| ErKa (~keryell@APuteaux-154-1-23-142.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) joined #fai. |
| verwilst (~verwilst@router.begen1.office.netnoc.eu) left irc: Quit: Ex-Chat |
| simNIX (~simNIX@156-60.bbned.dsl.internl.net) joined #fai. |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) joined #fai. |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) left irc: Read error: Connection reset by peer |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) joined #fai. |
| Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) left irc: Quit: leaving |
| siggg (~jean@AVelizy-151-1-42-212.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr) left irc: Quit: Leaving. |
| allee-k_ (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #fai. |
| allee-k (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds |
| allee-k_ (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds |
| Nic0 (~courtel@fw.tls.cena.fr) left irc: Quit: Leaving. |
| allee-k_ (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #fai. |
| Kajeci (~Kajeci@pa1-84-91-3-196.netvisao.pt) left irc: Quit: Quit |
| ErKa (~keryell@APuteaux-154-1-23-142.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds |
| allee-k_ (~allee-k@p54A4451A.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds |
| siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) joined #fai. |
| simNIX (~simNIX@156-60.bbned.dsl.internl.net) left irc: Remote host closed the connection |
| simNIX (~simNIX@156-60.bbned.dsl.internl.net) joined #fai. |
| siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) left irc: Quit: Leaving. |
| 21:15 tuvwx | how known is viper (automatic debian installer)? any experiences on how it compares to FAI? |
| 21:39 mgoetze | never heard of it |
| 21:40 tuvwx | what are my options if i want ldap-based dhcp and dns? |
| 21:58 tuvwx | mgoetze: yeah.. i just joined #viper (oftc), which is mentioned in their website, only to find out that i was the only one there! |
| Action: tuvwx is back to fai |
| 21:59 tuvwx | viper initially attracted me for its being completely ldap-based. but then i found out that they use their own custom ldap backend, which probably will not serve any other purpose but viper itself |
| --- Sat May 8 2010 |