k1lumin4t1 (~k1lumin4t@190.74.105.100) joined #fai.
06:12 k1lumin4t1hi there
06:12 k1lumin4t1wanting to get some feedback on FAI
08:06 oz_*feedback*
08:06 oz_enuff? ;)
Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) joined #fai.
10:07 \shMrfai, seems like FAI (src + binary) is gone from Ubuntu karmic
simNIX (~simNIX@156-60.bbned.dsl.internl.net) left irc: Quit: Ik ga weg
10:26 oz_is that good or bad?
10:37 Mrfai\sh: I've seen it in launchpad. Thanks a lot!
10:38 Mrfaioz_: this is good.
10:38 \shMrfai, you're welcome .)
11:08 oz_yea, I see no sense in fai for ubuntu anyway
11:08 oz_I found ubuntu-server less usable than vanilla-debian
11:08 oz_better we provide a "ubuntu-install" config with FAI in debain ... ?
11:08 oz_as users want the ubuntu desktop
Action: \sh wants ubuntu-server
11:10 oz_\sh: why?
11:10 \shless trouble with hardware drivers
11:11 \shand "dear management you can buy support from C."
11:12 \shand I can fix bugs I find more easily...;)
11:12 oz_:-)
Action: oz_ had several update probs he never experience with vanilla debian
11:14 \shbecause you will get the very same shit later in debian ;) upstart hell e.g.
11:16 \shbelieve me, I'm not happy with all of ubuntu ideas
11:17 oz_:-)
11:17 oz_year, we already talked about this
11:17 oz_I hope, this will NOT come
11:18 oz_And I hope the the debian stays with their "It's ready when it's ready" philosophy
11:18 oz_fixed release dates are pure...shit?
11:21 \shnope...regarding enterprise they are not...you have dates you can rely on
11:21 \shand for all other user monsters they need new food every 6 months ;)
11:22 oz_"you can relay on"...
11:22 oz_\sh: hm. my experience is different.
11:23 oz_what use is a fixed date, when the software has lots of bugs?
11:25 oz_happens with Debian also, I know
13:28 mgoetzeebbie: mit fcopy kannst du auch rechte direkt setzen, siehe dessen manpage
13:29 mgoetze\sh: i find upstart pretty cool actually, and have already installed it on my squeeze laptop :P
13:29 mgoetzeanyway, my customers want ubuntu servers. silly them, but i install it with fai anyway
14:35 ebbiemgoetze: ja, das habe ich mir schon gedacht, muss dann aber trotzdem "mehr" pflegen, du weisst doch, admins sind faul ;)
15:14 FBIfai: 3 lange committed revision 5530 to 7 fai:  add and fix bug numbers
pjustice (~pjustice@yagi.h-net.msu.edu) left irc: Read error: Operation timed out
pjustice (~pjustice@yagi.h-net.msu.edu) joined #fai.
pjustice (~pjustice@yagi.h-net.msu.edu) left irc: Read error: Operation timed out
ebbie (~username@berlin046.server4free.de) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds
16:04 h01gerwhy is 506459 minor+wontfix?
pjustice (~pjustice@yagi.h-net.msu.edu) joined #fai.
16:16 mgoetzeh01ger: well you can easily include gitcore in your nfsroot by adding it to /etc/fai/NFSROOT
16:16 mgoetzeh01ger: and i guess people getting their configspace via git are a rather small minority
Action: h01ger thinks gitcore is way more useful than cvs
16:19 mgoetzei could live with cvs being removed from the default nfsroot :)
16:30 Mrfaigood idea. Let's see who is using which tool.....
16:31 Mrfaigrep ...... q-answers.html (the fai questionnaire) | wc
16:31 Mrfaino revision control system for config space: 42
16:32 mgoetzeMrfai: well i keep my config space in svn, nevertheless i provide it to install clients via nfs
16:33 MrfaiRCS: 2, CVS: 7, git: 2, svn 23
16:33 h01gerMrfai, just today i was wondering how a company achieved iso9001 certification without using revision control systems. i assume they print their code on numbered paper for archival or such. that is clearly iso9001 compatible :-)
16:34 Mrfaimgoetze: in your fai questionnaire you would answer svn i guess, not nfs
16:34 mgoetzeMrfai: right, but i don't need svn in the nfsroot :)
16:34 Mrfaiyep
16:35 mgoetzeanyway as far as i'm concerned they can all go - people should get used to putting some minimal amount of work into their /etc/fai/*
16:35 Mrfaibut IMO a usefull default would be to have svn inside the nfsroot, but not cvs, git, bzr,...
16:35 Mrfaibtw bzr: 1
16:36 h01germgoetze, bah. fai should work out of the box, not with a minimal amount of work
16:36 mgoetzeh01ger: well, out of the box, it grabs the config space via nfs
16:37 mgoetzeso all you need is a comment in /etc/fai/fai.conf, telling people that if they change how they access the config space they also need to change /etc/fai/NFSROOT accordingly
16:38 Mrfaih01ger: even a d-i installation takes minimal amount of work ;-) and does not work out of the box
16:39 h01germgoetze, think softupdate
16:40 mgoetzeright, if you're doing softupdates you already need to make sure you install the rev ctrl system you're using...
16:40 mgoetzeor do you propose adding git-core, cvs, subversion, bzr, darcs etc. to simple-examples?
16:40 h01geri propose working-configspace instead of simple-examples
16:40 h01gerread the archives :-D
16:41 h01gersorry, i'm a bit busy and annoyed with $work atm... but that idea is really very old
Action: oz_ agrees with holger
16:43 mgoetzei'd like a working-configspace for rhel5. and soon, lucid :)
16:43 mgoetzedebian is too easy...
16:45 mgoetzeanyway, mein akku ist so gut wie leer, muss mir mal ein plaetzchen mit steckdose suchen ;)
ebbie (~username@berlin046.server4free.de) joined #fai.
pav5088 (Mark@ppp118-208-46-99.lns20.bne1.internode.on.net) left #fai (Leaving).
Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) left irc: Quit: leaving
simNIX (~simNIX@156-60.bbned.dsl.internl.net) joined #fai.
siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) joined #fai.
k1lumin4t1 (~k1lumin4t@190.74.105.100) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds
siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds
--- Thu Oct 15 2009

Generated by irclog2html.pl 2.1_h01ger1 by Jeff Waugh - find it at freshmeat.net! Customized by Holger 'h01ger' Levsen