[07:10] siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) joined #fai. [08:34] Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) joined #fai. [08:37] siggg (~jean@tra78-5-88-172-128-32.fbx.proxad.net) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [09:19] siggg (~jean@tra78-1-87-88-161-80.dsl.club-internet.fr) joined #fai. [10:01] moin [10:11] It seems that the next ubuntu version will not include a newer FAI version. Noone is able (or has time) to work on this. That's a pitty. Hey Ubuntu FAI developers, it would be nice to change this situation. [10:16] hey, ubuntu company, it would be nice to sponsor someone working on this :) [10:17] hey, ubuntu users, you're welcome to switch to debian ;) [10:19] but yeah, it woul be really nice to have this, and I have it on my list - but I don't run Ubuntu on servers, so it's not for me... [10:20] ... and so, there are some other things I need to work on for myself [10:20] is the problem just that you can't run fai-server on ubuntu, or that newer ubuntu versions can't be installed nicely (from a debian server) [10:22] the problem is that someone needs to test it, and it will take some time to run it as smooth as with Debian [10:23] mgoetze: when thomas talks about the package version in ubuntu, it's the former [10:23] Yes, it would be nice to have a customer which likes to pay for the ubuntu port [10:23] and yes, both things take time. and that makes only sense when you use it yourself or see a business case. [10:25] yeah, customers. but ubuntu users like nice looking things, and fai doiesn't even have a logo, nor a professional looking website. so it's hard to sell them fai. [10:30] lazyb0y, ubuntu users go for bling ? :) [10:31] if someone can give me a hand a bit, I'd be willing to sacrifice a WE for this [10:31] I have it running at home [10:31] but I see no sense in running ubuntu servers [10:32] aint it to late for jaunty anyway? [10:32] to be honest: I think ubuntu server sucks, ubuntu desktop is nice. [10:32] (or whatever the next release is called) [10:32] think so, yes [10:34] sep: they do. and apart from them, it would not harm the fai image in any way if there would be a logo and nice web design - an old topic, but a good point to mention it again :) [10:35] lazyb0y, design and logo's is hard in the FOSS world. you need someone that can spot the difference in colour nuance between Red Green and blue [10:37] we have a very nice proposal for a website [10:37] we have very nice proposals for logos, too :) [10:38] and where can these proposals be viewed? [10:41] wiki [10:41] search for logo [10:43] Action: oz_ would close down the website an only maintain the wiki [10:44] I still have the script for conversion. ;) [11:05] oz_: the fai website is maintain, and up-to-date. The content in the wiki is not maintained, and a lot of pages are outdated. [11:07] IMO outdated information is really disappointing for the users. [11:08] Action: h01ger btw is a very happy asciidoc user nowadays [11:08] h01ger: fine. This is another reason to move to asciidoc in the future [11:10] Action: mgoetze really likes the online manpages for grml generated by asciidoc [11:53] DarKnesS_WolF (~wolf@196.218.202.242) joined #fai. [11:54] hello i am installing a nice small ubuntu lab , here right now using fai but i need lettle help, the main idea of fai is installing from img ? or it can get the source from nfs over pxeboot and the configurations " like users / package selection / partining " from the 1st installed machine ? [11:55] uhm, have you tried reading any of the documentation? [11:56] mgoetze: to be honest nop but i am looking around , did read the ubuntu " multi-distribution " one but didn not giv eme any good idea [11:57] see first link in topic [11:58] k [12:20] Mrfai: wiki's are never totally accurate. but anyway, I am wqith you that a _website_ for a product is not the same as a _wiki_ - and both are needed. [12:21] but also, both look better when they have a nice design, and give potential users a good feeling. [12:21] ack ack [12:21] and one could define a set of pages which can only be changed by Admins [12:22] tempel (~mettler@p578b6607.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) joined #fai. [12:22] hai [12:24] hai [12:43] ErKa (~keryell@APuteaux-154-1-31-208.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) joined #fai. [13:50] DarKnesS_WolF (~wolf@196.218.202.242) left irc: Quit: leaving [14:32] faibot joined #fai. [14:43] rgsteele||work (~rgsteele@75.147.74.137) joined #fai. [15:47] bayoffire (~bayoffire@213.180.168.238) left irc: Remote host closed the connection [15:56] mzu (~martin@p4FC20611.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) joined #fai. [15:57] fai: 3 mt committed revision 5294 to 7 fai: - Added patch to fix #521153 [15:57] fai: - #521172 has already been fixed by a previous patch (which was actually meant [15:57] fai: to add additional features, but along the way it also fixes this issue) [16:34] Mrfai (~lange@suenner.informatik.uni-koeln.de) left irc: Quit: leaving [16:36] fai: 3 mt committed revision 5295 to 7 fai: reworked patch for GPT with BIOS support (now adds an additional 120k partition) [16:37] gn8 [16:37] tempel (~mettler@p578b6607.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) left irc: Quit: leaving [17:36] siggg (~jean@tra78-1-87-88-161-80.dsl.club-internet.fr) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [17:40] mzu (martin@p4FC20611.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) left #fai. [17:50] zirpu (~zirpu@nefud.org) joined #fai. [19:15] rgsteele||work (~rgsteele@75.147.74.137) left irc: Remote host closed the connection [19:28] ErKa (~keryell@APuteaux-154-1-31-208.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [00:00] --- Thu Mar 26 2009